finance · August 28, 2026
Teledyne Technologies Posts Higher Revenue, Operating Income, Net Income, and Diluted EPS on Both Three-Month and Six-Month Windows in Interim Filing
Key financial metrics
Reported figures from the filing; no estimates.
| Metric | Reported | Prior-year comparable |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1,662,500,000the three months ended June 28, 2026 | $1,513,700,000the three months ended June 29, 2025 |
| Operating income | $333,200,000the three months ended June 28, 2026 | $278,200,000the three months ended June 29, 2025 |
| Net income | $251,700,000the three months ended June 28, 2026 | $209,900,000the three months ended June 29, 2025 |
| Diluted earnings per share | $5.37 per diluted sharethe three months ended June 28, 2026 | $4.43 per diluted sharethe three months ended June 29, 2025 |
| Operating cash flow | $549,200,000the six months ended June 28, 2026 | $469,200,000the six months ended June 29, 2025 |
| Cash and equivalents | $340,100,000the balance sheet date of June 28, 2026 | Not reported |
What the sources reported
Bottom line
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated ("Teledyne" or the "Company") recorded a profit for both the three-month reporting period the three months ended June 28, 2026 and the six-month year-to-date period the six months ended June 28, 2026, with each earnings line higher than the comparable prior-year windows the three months ended June 29, 2025 and the six months ended June 29, 2025. The reported figures span Revenue from Contract with Customer, Excluding Assessed Tax, Operating Income (Loss), Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Parent, and Earnings Per Share, Diluted, each of which expanded on a year-over-year basis for the three-month and six-month windows without any sign of a swing from profit to loss. The filing itself is an unaudited interim report under 10-Q for period-ended-2026-06-28, filed under 0001094285-26-000043 by the registrant identified by 0001094285 and traded as TDY, and the company name itself appears under TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
For the three-month window, Revenue from Contract with Customer, Excluding Assessed Tax came in at $1,662,500,000 USD, above $1,513,700,000 USD in the prior-year quarter. Operating Income (Loss) reached $333,200,000 USD versus $278,200,000 USD previously, and Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Parent landed at $251,700,000 USD against $209,900,000 USD, with Earnings Per Share, Diluted of $5.37 per diluted share USD/SHARES compared with $4.43 per diluted share USD/SHARES. The same profit-to-profit pattern holds across the six-month year-to-date period, where Revenue from Contract with Customer, Excluding Assessed Tax of $3,222,600,000 USD exceeded $2,963,600,000 USD, Operating Income (Loss) of $627,400,000 USD exceeded $537,500,000 USD, Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Parent of $478,500,000 USD exceeded $398,500,000 USD, and Earnings Per Share, Diluted of $10.20 per diluted share USD/SHARES exceeded $8.41 per diluted share USD/SHARES.
Management frames these results as fair presentations of consolidated financial position as of the balance-sheet date associated with the six months ended June 28, 2026 and of the results of operations and cash flows for both the quarter and six months covered by the three months ended June 28, 2026 and the six months ended June 28, 2026, while cautioning that the second-quarter results captured under the three months ended June 28, 2026 are not necessarily indicative of the rest of the fiscal year. Recent acquisitions noted in the cited note Note 2 (covering DD-Scientific, TransponderTech, NL Acoustics, Micropac, and the Optical Systems and Advanced Electronics Systems ("Qioptiq") businesses) add context to the period under review, and segment information sits in the cited note Note 3, with goodwill detail in the cited note Note 5 and revenue recognition detail in the cited note Note 4. The filing evidence does not attribute this change to any single cause.. The filing evidence contains no peer or industry comparison..
Financial performance
- Top-line performance was framed in two paired reporting windows: the three-month reporting period ending the three months ended June 28, 2026 and the six-month year-to-date period ending the six months ended June 28, 2026, each presented against the prior-year comparative under 10-Q for TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC (ticker TDY, CIK 0001094285, accession 0001094285-26-000043). - Revenue from Contract with Customer, Excluding Assessed Tax for the current three-month reporting period was $1,662,500,000 USD, against the prior-year comparative of $1,513,700,000 USD for the three months ended June 29, 2025; on the six-month window, the current period reached $3,222,600,000 USD versus $2,963,600,000 USD for the six months ended June 29, 2025.
The filing evidence does not attribute this change to any single cause. - Operating Income (Loss) on the three-month window was $333,200,000 USD against $278,200,000 USD, and on the six-month window was $627,400,000 USD against $537,500,000 USD; every column reported an operating profit. The filing evidence does not attribute this change to any single cause.
- Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Parent on the three-month window was $251,700,000 USD against $209,900,000 USD, and on the six-month window was $478,500,000 USD against $398,500,000 USD, with each column retaining a profit. 41 per diluted share USD/SHARES for the six months ended June 29, 2025. - Accounting context rests on the segment disclosures in Note 3, the acquisition disclosures in Note 2, the goodwill note in Note 5, and the revenue disaggregation principles in Note 4; provisional fair values for TransponderTech and DD-Scientific are tracked through Note 2 and Note 5, while Note 1 and Note 15 describe redeemable noncontrolling interest and stockholders' equity presentation.
- Compared with similar interim shapes — for example the Broadcom Posts Higher Revenue, Operating Income, and Diluted EPS Year-Over-Year in Filing analysis — the directional pattern here repeats the same profit-to-profit transition on every reported metric. The filing evidence contains no peer or industry comparison. - The interim filing offers no forward guidance text beyond standard ASU adoption commentary, so outlook is left as an explicitly unstated dimension.
Operating drivers and segments
- Teledyne's segment framework, as described in the cited note on Business Segments, organizes results across Digital Imaging, Instrumentation, Engineered Systems and Aerospace & Defense Electronics, with each segment carrying separate net sales and operating income lines while corporate expenses are reported separately and excluded from segment results. - Revenue for the three-month reporting period the three months ended June 28, 2026 stood at $1,662,500,000 USD, higher than the prior-year comparative the three months ended June 29, 2025 level of $1,513,700,000 USD. - Revenue for the six-month year-to-date period the six months ended June 28, 2026 reached $3,222,600,000 USD, above the prior-year comparative the six months ended June 29, 2025 level of $2,963,600,000 USD. - Operating Income for the three-month reporting period the three months ended June 28, 2026 was $333,200,000 USD, higher than the prior-year comparative the three months ended June 29, 2025 level of $278,200,000 USD. - Operating Income for the six-month year-to-date period the six months ended June 28, 2026 was $627,400,000 USD, higher than the prior-year comparative the six months ended June 29, 2025 level of $537,500,000 USD. - The cited note on Business Segments shows segment results include net sales and operating income by segment but exclude corporate expenses, leaving a structural wedge between segment-level operating performance and consolidated operating income. - Within Instrumentation, the cited note on Business Segments identifies three product lines: Marine Instrumentation, Environmental Instrumentation and Test and Measurement Instrumentation, with the DD-Scientific acquisition folded into this segment since the first quarter. - The Engineered Systems segment is described in the cited note on Business Segments as having a mix of fixed-price and cost-reimbursable contracts, with the cited note indicating that for the six months ended June (omitted) approximately (omitted) of net sales in that segment was derived from fixed-price contracts.
- Management attributes segment revenue patterns to the structure of fixed-price versus cost-reimbursable contracts and to changes in estimates on contracts accounted for under the cost-to-cost method, with the cited note on Business Segments reporting that the net aggregate effect of these estimate changes in the first six months was (omitted) million of favorable operating income compared with (omitted) million of favorable operating income in the prior-year period, driven primarily by favorable changes within the Digital Imaging segment. - Management discusses acquisition activity through the cited note on Business Acquisitions, covering the DD-Scientific acquisition completed in the first quarter, the TransponderTech acquisition completed in the prior fourth quarter, the NL Acoustics redeemable noncontrolling interest transaction completed in the third quarter, and the Micropac Industries acquisition completed in the first quarter; each of these transactions has been integrated into the operating segments described in the cited note on Business Segments. - Management addresses goodwill quality through the cited note on Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets, noting that based on the annual assessment in the fourth quarter all reporting units except the FLIR reporting unit within the Digital Imaging segment had estimated fair values that significantly exceeded their carrying values. - Management outlines the basis of presentation through the cited note on Basis of Presentation, confirming the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect normal recurring adjustments and are prepared in accordance with GAAP as it applies to interim reporting. - Management explains the application of the new income-statement disaggregation standard through the cited note on Basis of Presentation, indicating the Company is evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance on its consolidated financial statements. - The filing evidence does not attribute this change to any single cause. - Peer comparison: The filing evidence contains no peer or industry comparison. - Reference set used: Note 3, Note 4, Note 2, Note 5, Note 1.
Cash flow and capital
- Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities was $549,200,000 USD for the six months ended June 28, 2026, up from $469,200,000 USD for the six months ended June 29, 2025. Operating cash generation stayed clearly positive, leaving the company with internally funded headroom for capex, buybacks, and balance sheet management. The filing evidence does not attribute this change to any single cause.
- Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities was -$118,800,000 USD for the six months ended June 28, 2026, with the prior-year window at -$805,200,000 USD; outflows narrowed year over year. Payments to Acquire Property, Plant, and Equipment were $60,200,000 USD for the six months ended June 28, 2026 versus $48,300,000 USD for the six months ended June 29, 2025, so capex ticked higher even as total investing outflows improved. The filing evidence does not attribute this change to any single cause.
- Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities was -$436,700,000 USD for the six months ended June 28, 2026, versus -$4,800,000 USD for the six months ended June 29, 2025; the company remained a net user of financing cash on both windows, and outflows grew. Payments for Repurchase of Common Stock were $2,900,000 USD for the six months ended June 28, 2026 against $2,900,000 USD for the six months ended June 29, 2025, so buyback pace was essentially flat year over year. - On the period-end balance sheet, Cash and Cash Equivalents, at Carrying Value stood at $340,100,000 USD as of the balance sheet date of June 28, 2026.
Long-term Debt, Excluding Current Maturities was $2,026,900,000 USD, and Accounts Payable, Current was $492,300,000 USD. Corporate assets, including the cash balance alongside deferred taxes, pension assets, and other assets, sit at the parent level rather than inside the four reportable segments (Digital Imaging, Instrumentation, Aerospace and Defense Electronics, and Engineered Systems) described in Note 3. - Capital allocation stayed balanced: higher operating cash inflows and slightly lower net investing outflows coincided with a steady buyback program and modestly higher capex.
With financing cash outflows widening year over year, the wider gap between operating and investing flows suggests the period's funding mix leaned more on internal generation than on debt or equity issuance. The filing evidence contains no peer or industry comparison. - Goodwill from the TransponderTech and DD-Scientific deals referenced in Note 2 remains provisional pending finalization of acquisition accounting; their individual and aggregate effects on results were not material.
Comparing interim filings of this style, the pattern of strong operating cash plus disciplined buybacks recurs across recent peers, as shown in Broadcom Posts Higher Revenue, Operating Income, and Diluted EPS Year-Over-Year in Filing and Palantir Technologies Reports Higher Revenue, Operating Income, Net Income, and Diluted EPS on Both Windows in Interim Filing, although each issuer's exact split of capex, M&A, and repurchases differs.
The filing evidence contains no peer or industry comparison.
Peer and historical context
Teledyne's own year-over-year comparison, drawn from the same interim filing, sets the only baseline available in the filing evidence. Revenue for the three months ended June 28, 2026 rose relative to the three months ended June 29, 2025, while revenue for the six months ended June 28, 2026 also climbed versus the six months ended June 29, 2025. Operating Income tracked the same direction in both windows, higher in the current quarter and higher on the year-to-date window than the prior-year comparatives. Net Income Attributable to Parent followed the same pattern: a larger profit for the three months ended June 28, 2026 than for the three months ended June 29, 2025, and a larger profit for the six months ended June 28, 2026 than for the six months ended June 29, 2025. Earnings Per Share, Diluted registered a profit-to-profit increase on both windows. Within the cash flow statement, Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities was higher in the six months ended June 28, 2026 than in the six months ended June 29, 2025, while Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities and Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities both shifted in opposite directions to the prior year, leaving operating cash generation as the year-over-year tailwind within the cash flow set.
The interim filing presents no external benchmarking against named peers or industry indices. The filing evidence contains no peer or industry comparison. Without that outside reference frame, any statement positioning Teledyne against competitors, sector averages, or index returns sits outside what the filing evidence supports and is therefore not asserted here. Readers looking for cross-issuer comparison can look at adjacent interim filings such as Broadcom Posts Higher Revenue, Operating Income, and Diluted EPS Year-Over-Year in the reporting period Filing or Agilent Technologies Posts Higher Revenue, Operating Income, Net Income and Diluted EPS on Both Three-Month and Six-Month Windows in Interim Filing for parallel issuer patterns, but those comparisons are not part of this filing's evidence base.
The catalog also leaves room for cautionary reading of the year-over-year set. The current window includes revenue and operating income contributions from acquisitions completed during the comparative period, as described under Note 2 and the segment discussion in Note 3, so a portion of the higher revenue and operating income versus the prior year is inorganic rather than purely organic. The disclosure under Note 4 on revenue recognition and contract balances, together with the EAC process for over-time cost-to-cost contracts, indicates that reported revenue and operating income also reflect cumulative catch-up effects from changes in contract estimates. Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities moved in the opposite direction to the prior year, and Payments to Acquire Property, Plant, and Equipment were higher in the six months ended June 28, 2026 than in the six months ended June 29, 2025, which tempers the read-through from operating profit growth to free cash growth and points toward higher reinvestment rather than cash returns. The filing evidence does not attribute this change to any single cause.
Scenario analysis
The base case assumes that Teledyne’s recent performance remains positive, with revenue and net income staying higher than their prior-year levels on both the quarter and year-to-date windows. Revenue was $1,662,500,000 in the three months ended June 28, 2026, compared with $1,513,700,000 in the three months ended June 29, 2025. For the year-to-date comparison, revenue was $3,222,600,000 in the six months ended June 28, 2026, compared with $2,963,600,000 in the six months ended June 29, 2025.
Profitability also remained constructive. Net income attributable to the parent was $251,700,000 in the three months ended June 28, 2026, versus $209,900,000 in the three months ended June 29, 2025. The year-to-date net income figure was $478,500,000 in the six months ended June 28, 2026, compared with $398,500,000 in the six months ended June 29, 2025. The filing’s revenue-recognition discussion indicates that remaining performance obligations are expected to be recognized into revenue over future periods, supporting a generally stable near-term operating backdrop. At the same time, the company’s estimate-at-completion process introduces judgment on long-term contracts, meaning future results may reflect revised cost and revenue estimates as work progresses.
The upside case would involve continued revenue growth accompanied by sustained profit expansion, rather than growth occurring without comparable earnings improvement. The current quarter and year-to-date results already show higher revenue and higher net income than the corresponding prior-year periods, providing a favorable foundation for that scenario. Continued recognition of firm orders, together with favorable contract-estimate outcomes, could support additional operating momentum.
The company reports that its significant contracts are generally reviewed and reassessed each quarter. This creates potential for future earnings to benefit from favorable revisions, although the filing evidence does not attribute any particular change to a single cause. The filing evidence does not attribute this change to any single cause.
The downside case would arise if revenue growth moderates, contract performance weakens, or revised estimates reduce profitability. Teledyne’s contracts require management judgment concerning costs, scheduling, technical matters, and revenue estimates, and revisions can affect current-period earnings through cumulative catch-up adjustments. If anticipated costs rise or contract performance deteriorates, those revisions could pressure future results.
A loss contract requires a provision for the total anticipated loss when the loss becomes evident. This exposure makes execution and estimate discipline important, particularly for longer-duration arrangements. The filing also identifies the FLIR reporting unit and FLIR indefinite-lived trademark as having less valuation headroom than the company’s other reporting units and trademarks. The company stated that no events or changes indicated that the FLIR reporting unit’s fair value was more likely than not below its carrying value, and that the same conclusion applied to the FLIR trademark. Nonetheless, these cited goodwill and intangible-asset matters remain relevant monitoring points. The filing evidence contains no peer or industry comparison. The filing evidence contains no peer or industry comparison.
Risks and what to watch
- Reported facts for the TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC interim filing 10-Q for period-ended-2026-06-28 under accession 0001094285-26-000043 show revenue of $1,662,500,000 USD for the three months ended June 28, 2026 against $1,513,700,000 USD for the three months ended June 29, 2025, a year-over-year increase, with the six-month picture mirroring that move: $3,222,600,000 USD versus $2,963,600,000 USD across the six months ended June 28, 2026 and the six months ended June 29, 2025. Net income attributable to parent tracked the same direction: $251,700,000 USD against $209,900,000 USD, and $478,500,000 USD against $398,500,000 USD, profit in both windows on both sides.
- Management explanations centre on the cost-to-cost accounting method, noting that the net aggregate effects of estimate changes on those contracts added a favorable operating income contribution in the first six months of the six months ended June 28, 2026, smaller than a similarly favorable contribution in the first six months of the six months ended June 29, 2025, with the prior-year delta primarily tied to favorable changes in the Digital Imaging segment, which is the structure introduced in Note 3. On goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, management states that all reporting units except the FLIR reporting unit within Digital Imaging had fair values that significantly exceeded carrying value at the most recent annual assessment, with no subsequent events or circumstances indicating the FLIR unit's fair value has fallen below carrying value; the next annual analysis is scheduled for the fourth quarter of the six months ended June 28, 2026.
The same caveat applies to the FLIR indefinite-lived trademark, discussed alongside goodwill in Note 5. - Analyst inference: the FLIR fair-value cushion is the most obvious watch item, because management has flagged it as the only Digital Imaging unit whose estimated fair value did not significantly exceed carrying value, and the FLIR trademark carries the same caveat. Any adverse change in Digital Imaging assumptions or contract performance could compress that headroom and, combined with the smaller favorable contract-estimate movement already disclosed in Note 4, would dent the segment that the Note 2 acquisition activity and Note 15 redeemable noncontrolling interest disclosure both lean on.
The reader should also note that segment mix is heavily imaging-weighted per Note 3, so a single-segment stumble is enough to swing consolidated results. - Counter-evidence: the only explicit offsetting signal in the filing is the smaller favorable operating-income swing from contract-estimate changes versus the prior-year period, plus the concentrated FLIR exposure inside Digital Imaging. No peer or industry comparison is included, so it is not possible to test whether Teledyne's growth is broad-based or segment-specific.
- Unknowns: the filing does not attribute the change between the two periods to any single cause, so further direction cannot be inferred from this evidence. - Metrics to watch next period: revenue and net income for the next three-month and six-month windows under the same cost-to-cost framework, the size and sign of net aggregate estimate changes under Note 4, any FLIR-related impairment indicators flagged through Note 5, updates to the Digital Imaging segment under Note 3, the Item 1A risk-factor refresh and the Item 4 controls and legal-proceedings update, and the timing of new acquisition disclosures under Note 2 given their influence on goodwill.
Readers comparing filings across issuers can cross-check the profit-to-profit pattern against Agilent Technologies Posts Higher Revenue, Operating Income, Net Income and Diluted EPS on Both Three-Month and Six-Month Windows in Interim Filing for context.
finance analyst take
Discussion
1 message · grounded in the same frozen signal set
Marcus Thorne
Channel Strategy Analyst · Seo growth · #1 · Conditional · Skeptical
The headline reads like a clean growth story, but the financing cash flow line deserves a second look. Net cash used in financing swung from roughly -$5M to -$437M, which suggests a meaningfully larger payout, debt move, or buyback. Operating results look strong on both windows, yet I would want segment color and a reconciliation of that financing delta before calling this a clean beat. For a broader view across recent interim filings, see Arista Networks Posts Profit-to-Profit Growth on Both Three-Month and Six-Month Windows in Interim Filing.
AI analysis by Lizely. Grounded in linked public evidence. Participants are fictional editorial roles, not real people or human authors.
More from other categories
Mini Games
Gamescom 2026 opens in Cologne with record exhibitor count and flagship reveals
Calculators
AMD rolls out Tokenomics Calculator as enterprise AI cost tools expand across genomics and personal finance
Image Tools
xAI ships Grok Imagine Image 2.0, surfaces in ComfyUI and tightens X deepfake policy