Skip to content
MSCI Inc. Posts Higher Revenue, Operating Income, Net Income, and Diluted EPS on Both Three-Month and Six-Month Windows

finance · August 26, 2026

MSCI Inc. Posts Higher Revenue, Operating Income, Net Income, and Diluted EPS on Both Three-Month and Six-Month Windows

Key financial metrics

Reported figures from the filing; no estimates.

MetricReportedPrior-year comparable
Revenue$867,000,000the three months ended June 30, 2026$772,700,000the three months ended June 30, 2025
Operating income$487,500,000the three months ended June 30, 2026$425,300,000the three months ended June 30, 2025
Net income$342,000,000the three months ended June 30, 2026$303,700,000the three months ended June 30, 2025
Diluted earnings per share$4.69 per diluted sharethe three months ended June 30, 2026$3.92 per diluted sharethe three months ended June 30, 2025
Operating cash flow$677,600,000the six months ended June 30, 2026$637,900,000the six months ended June 30, 2025
Cash and equivalents$356,400,000the balance sheet date of June 30, 2026Not reported

What the sources reported

Bottom line

For the three-month period ended the three months ended June 30, 2026, MSCI Inc. (MSCI) reported diluted earnings per share of $4.69 per diluted share USD/SHARES, compared with $3.92 per diluted share USD/SHARES in the prior-year three-month window — a profit-to-profit increase. For the six-month year-to-date window the six months ended June 30, 2026, diluted earnings per share of $10.23 per diluted share USD/SHARES also came in above the prior-year $7.63 per diluted share USD/SHARES, again on a profit-to-profit basis.

Net income attributable to parent followed the same shape. The latest three-month net income stood at $342,000,000 USD, up from $303,700,000 USD a year earlier, and the six-month figure of $748,000,000 USD exceeded the prior-year $592,300,000 USD. Operating income, likewise, rose on both windows: $487,500,000 USD for the quarter versus $425,300,000 USD, and $944,400,000 USD for the half year versus $802,300,000 USD, with each transition profit to profit. Revenue from contracts with customers tracked in the same direction, climbing to $867,000,000 USD in the quarter from $772,700,000 USD and to $1,717,800,000 USD in the half year from $1,518,500,000 USD. Across all four dimensions the movement is the same: current period higher than prior period, profit to profit where applicable. The filing evidence does not attribute this change to any single cause.

The filing's identity in this section is MSCI's Form 10-Q for the fiscal period covering the three months ended June 30, 2026 (and the year-to-date the six months ended June 30, 2026), filed under CIK 0001408198 with accession 0001408198-26-000046. The source is the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements and accompanying notes prepared by the Company under GAAP and the instructions to Form 10-Q, consistent with the Company's audited annual report on Form (omitted). MSCI's described business — research-based data, analytics and indexes, supported by advanced technology, alongside portfolio construction and risk management tools, sustainability and climate solutions, and private asset data and analytics — frames the revenue line. Segment-level detail is not separately disclosed in the filing evidence for these four dimensions, so any breakdown by product family or geography is not available here.

Coverage in this section is limited to what the ledger supports: the four headline metrics for both the three-month and six-month windows, plus the prior-year comparatives. Cash-flow, balance-sheet, share-repurchase, dividend, capital-expenditure, and fair-value-tier dimensions referenced elsewhere in the catalog fall outside this section's scope. No peer, industry or analyst benchmark is supplied in the filing evidence, so any cross-company read on the move from $772,700,000 USD to $867,000,000 USD or the parallel EPS step-up would require a separate filing. Readers can compare the same profit-to-profit pattern in peers such as the Broadcom Posts Higher Revenue, Operating Income, and Diluted EPS Year-Over-Year in Filing write-up, but the evidence here does not itself benchmark MSCI against any other issuer.

Financial performance

, identified by the 10-Q filed for period-ended-2026-06-30 under accession 0001408198-26-000046, is reported as a profit in both the three-month and six-month windows in both the current and prior-year comparative periods, with each authorized comparison confirming a profit-to-profit transition. - Revenue from Contract with Customer, Excluding Assessed Tax was higher than the prior period on both the three-month and the six-month year-to-date windows, recording $867,000,000 USD for the three months ended June 30, 2026 against $772,700,000 USD for the three months ended June 30, 2025, and $1,717,800,000 USD for the six months ended June 30, 2026 against $1,518,500,000 USD for the six months ended June 30, 2025; the company is described in the filing as providing research-based data, analytics and indexes that set standards for global investors, supporting a recurring-revenue mix across indexes, portfolio construction and risk management tools, sustainability and climate solutions, and private asset data and analytics.

- Operating Income (Loss) was higher than the prior period on both windows, at $487,500,000 USD for the three months ended June 30, 2026 versus $425,300,000 USD for the three months ended June 30, 2025, and $944,400,000 USD for the six months ended June 30, 2026 versus $802,300,000 USD for the six months ended June 30, 2025, again reported as a profit on each side. 63 per diluted share USD/SHARES for the year-to-date. - For interim period-over-period comparisons, the quarter result sits against the three-month reporting period and the year-to-date result sits against the six-month reporting period; readers cross-checking the trend can compare the latest print against the prior print without recomputing ratios.

- Management explains that the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and the instructions to the 10-Q and Article (omitted) of Regulation S-X, should be read with the audited statements in the Annual Report on Form (omitted), and reflect normal recurring adjustments; results for interim periods are described as not necessarily indicative of results for the entire year, with significant estimates covering impairment of goodwill and intangible assets and income taxes.

- The basis-of-presentation note records that in the first quarter of (omitted) the Company changed presentation from thousands to millions, with prior-period amounts rounded accordingly; this is a presentation re-scaling rather than a restatement of the underlying business, and the change applies consistently across the comparison baselines. - The filing's recent-accounting-pronouncements section discloses a FASB update on expense disaggregation that the Company is currently evaluating, and a practical expedient for estimating expected credit losses on accounts receivable and contract assets whose adoption is described as not having a material effect; no management forward guidance for revenue, margin, or EPS is included in the cited narrative.

- The filing evidence does not attribute this change to any single cause. - No segment-level revenue, operating income, or customer-concentration split is disclosed in the cited excerpts, and the filing notes that no single customer represented (omitted) or more of operating revenues within Analytics, Sustainability and Climate or All Other – Private Assets; The filing evidence does not disclose segment-level detail for this dimension. - No peer or industry comparison is supplied in the filing evidence, so relative performance against other index, analytics, or data providers cannot be assessed from this filing; The filing evidence contains no peer or industry comparison.

- Reference items Item 1, Item 1A, Item 2, Item 3, Item 4, Item 5, and Item 6 cover the Part II disclosures (Legal Proceedings, Risk Factors, Unregistered Sales of Equity, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, Controls and Procedures, Other Information, and Exhibits) and are not used here as numeric anchors.

Operating drivers and segments

The interim filing identifies only one operating segment for result reporting purposes — Sustainability and Climate — with the cited note flagging that the acquired First Street business will be reported within that segment once the transaction closes. Underneath the segment surface, the income statement offers two top-line readings tied to the standard MSCI product mix described in the introduction: data, analytics and indexes that set standards for global investors. Revenue from contract with customers for the three-month reporting period was $867,000,000 USD, against $772,700,000 USD for the prior-year comparative, an authorized increase.

The six-month year-to-date revenue figure was $1,717,800,000 USD, versus $1,518,500,000 USD for the prior-year comparative period, also an authorized increase. Operating income for the three-month reporting period was $487,500,000 USD, against $425,300,000 USD — an authorized increase and a profit-to-profit transition. Operating income for the six-month year-to-date period was $944,400,000 USD, against $802,300,000 USD, again an authorized increase on a profit-to-profit basis.

Because the filing presents only segment-level operating income rather than a cost-of-revenue or selling-expense schedule, the slice of margin movement attributable to compensation, technology, or acquisition-related amortization is not disclosed in this interim report. Management frames the operating environment as a continued build-out of research-based data, analytics and indexes, supported by advanced technology, with a forward-looking lens on the freshly acquired First Street climate-risk franchise. The acquisition-related language makes clear that the deal is positioned inside the Sustainability and Climate operating segment upon closing, reinforcing a deliberate expansion of the climate data franchise rather than a generic M&A comment.

Management also notes the recent accounting amendments that require entities to begin capitalizing software costs once a software project is authorized, committed and probable to be completed, a policy change with potential implications for the technology backbone of the index and analytics franchises. Apart from those structural signals, the filing does not isolate a single management-cited driver of the year-over-year movement in revenue or operating income on either the quarterly or half-year window, so any attempt to name a primary cause would overstate what is on the page.

The filing evidence does not attribute this change to any single cause. <prose> The cleanest independent reading of the evidence is that the top line and the operating line both moved higher on both windows, with the segment structure narrowly defined around Sustainability and Climate for reporting purposes. The authorized revenue increases and authorized operating-income increases — on a profit-to-profit basis across the quarter and the half-year — are mutually consistent, which suggests that the improvement was broad-based enough not to require a one-off narrative in the filing.

There is no separate disclosure of subscription versus asset-based fees, of geographic mix, or of cost-base evolution in this interim document, so the linkage between revenue growth and operating-income growth cannot be decomposed further from the cited figures alone. Readers weighing the result against peer filings, such as the parallel revenue and net-income walk in REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA INC Posts Higher Revenue and Net Income in Filing or the broad-tech comparison in Broadcom Posts Higher Revenue, Operating Income, and Diluted EPS Year-Over-Year in Filing, should note that those issuers report in materially different industries, so any direction-only parallel is illustrative rather than a peer benchmark.

The filing evidence contains no peer or industry comparison.

Cash flow and capital

- Reported facts: Cash and cash equivalents stood at $356,400,000 USD as of the balance sheet date of June 30, 2026, while long-term debt, excluding current maturities, was $6,380,400,000 USD on the same balance sheet date. For the six-month year-to-date period ending the six months ended June 30, 2026, operating cash flow was $677,600,000 USD, investing activities used -$132,000,000 USD, and financing activities used -$703,900,000 USD. Capital expenditure outflows reached $13,800,000 USD, share repurchases were $583,200,000 USD, and ordinary common dividends paid totalled $300,000,000 USD over the same six-month window.

The prior-year comparative six-month period, ending the six months ended June 30, 2025, showed operating cash flow of $637,900,000 USD, investing outflows of -$67,500,000 USD, and financing outflows of -$642,800,000 USD, alongside capital expenditures of $22,900,000 USD, share repurchases of $351,600,000 USD, and dividend payments of $283,500,000 USD. - Management explanations: The filing narrative describes a presentation change effective in the first quarter of the current year, switching financial statements and accompanying footnote disclosure from thousands to millions and applying rounding adjustments to prior period amounts.

Management also notes that the reduction in the deferred revenue balance during the period was driven primarily by revenue recognised on existing contracts, partially offset by new billings, although the filing does not assign a causal driver to the broader cash-flow movements. - Analyst inference: Operating cash flow expanded on a year-over-year basis, with the authorised direction confirming an increase from the prior-year six-month comparative; the company funded larger share repurchases and a higher dividend payout alongside that expansion, while investing and financing outflows both deepened relative to the prior-year six-month period.

The pattern suggests the issuer was returning more capital to shareholders than it absorbed through investing and financing activity, with operating cash generation covering both the elevated capital return and the wider investing spend. - Counter-evidence: The filing does not break out the components of investing or financing outflows in this excerpt, so the analyst cannot verify whether the larger investing outflow reflects recent bolt-on activity in private markets, index, and climate-risk data assets referenced elsewhere in the document, nor whether the financing outflow shift reflects net debt repayment versus share-related cash effects.

The balance sheet snapshot is also limited to cash and long-term debt, leaving working capital and lease positions outside the reader's view. - Unknowns: The filing does not state why operating cash flow improved, why investing outflows widened, or why financing outflows deepened year over year. The filing evidence does not attribute this change to any single cause.

Peer and historical context

The filing evidence does not attribute this change to any single cause. The filing evidence contains no peer or industry comparison. Reading MSCI Inc.'s interim filing — submitted on 10-Q for period-ended-2026-06-30 under accession 0001408198-26-000046 — against its own year-ago windows shows a broadly favorable half-year profile on both the top and operating lines. Revenue from contracts with customers for the six months of the six months ended June 30, 2026 came in at $1,717,800,000 USD, higher than the $1,518,500,000 USD posted in the prior-year six-month period, the six months ended June 30, 2025. The three-month pattern tells the same story: revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2026 reached $867,000,000 USD, exceeding the $772,700,000 USD reported for the three months ended June 30, 2025.

Profitability likewise expanded on a comparable basis. Operating income for the half-year period was $944,400,000 USD, an improvement over $802,300,000 USD a year earlier, and the three-month operating income of $487,500,000 USD was higher than the $425,300,000 USD recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2025. Net income attributable to parent tracked the same direction at both windows: $748,000,000 USD for the six-month period versus $592,300,000 USD previously, and $342,000,000 USD for the quarter versus $303,700,000 USD in the prior-year quarter. Cash generation also stepped up, with operating cash flow of $677,600,000 USD for the year-to-date period, exceeding the $637,900,000 USD recorded over the comparable prior-year stretch. In every pair the company remained profitable on both the half-year and quarterly frames, with no transition between profit and loss on any reported measure.

Set against that self-comparison, the 10-Q filing provides no benchmark against sector peers or a defined industry index, so any ranking of the quarter or half-year trajectory relative to other index, analytics or data providers is not available on the record. For broader sector context, the half-year direction on revenue, operating income and diluted earnings per share mirrors the pattern captured for Broadcom Posts Higher Revenue, Operating Income, and Diluted EPS Year-Over-Year in Filing, although the two businesses operate in different segments of the technology landscape and a like-for-like read-across is not implied. Outside that directional parallel, the filing does not disclose how MSCI's growth or margin profile stacks up against named competitors, so any closer peer ranking is left open.

Scenario analysis

In the base case, MSCI's reported trajectory continues along the trend visible in the filing's two comparative windows. Revenue from Contract with Customer, Excluding Assessed Tax reached $1,717,800,000 USD for the six months ended June 30, 2026, higher than the prior-year figure of $1,518,500,000 USD for the six months ended June 30, 2025, and the three-month series shows the same pattern, with $867,000,000 USD for the three months ended June 30, 2026 exceeding $772,700,000 USD for the three months ended June 30, 2025. Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Parent mirrored that direction, posting $748,000,000 USD for the six months ended June 30, 2026 versus $592,300,000 USD for the six months ended June 30, 2025, and $342,000,000 USD for the three months ended June 30, 2026 against $303,700,000 USD for the three months ended June 30, 2025. Under this central reading, MSCI's recurring subscription mix, deferred revenue roll-off, and the integration of recent acquisitions keep top-line and bottom-line results compounding on both windows without margin dislocation.

In the upside case, the same revenue base benefits from faster cross-sell of recently acquired platforms, and reported profit extends further. Vantager's pre-investment due diligence workflows, Compass's multi-asset and alternative index capabilities, and PM Insights' secondary-market private-company reference data each become monetizable inside the Sustainability and Climate or Index segments sooner than the base path assumes, while First Street's physics-based climate risk data layers into existing climate index products once the pending third-quarter close completes, with consideration tied to specified revenue thresholds. Higher product attach keeps Revenue from Contract with Customer, Excluding Assessed Tax ahead of the $772,700,000 USD and $1,518,500,000 USD anchors, and Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Parent extends above the $592,300,000 USD and $303,700,000 USD comparatives as deferred revenue recognized on existing contracts continues to outpace new billings. For context on how peer reporting windows have framed similar profit-to-profit growth, the Broadcom Posts Higher Revenue, Operating Income, and Diluted EPS Year-Over-Year in Filing insight offers a useful cross-check.

In the downside case, the subscription franchise softens and contingent consideration, deal costs, and integration spend from the Vantager, Compass, PM Insights, and pending First Street transactions pressure the reported figures. The filing evidence does not attribute this change to any single cause. If new billings fail to keep pace with revenue recognized on existing contracts, the deferred revenue balance compresses and reported growth in Revenue from Contract with Customer, Excluding Assessed Tax moderates relative to the $867,000,000 USD and $1,717,800,000 USD outcomes. A re-measurement of Level 3 contingent consideration liabilities tied to forecasted product sales, probability of achievement of certain integration targets, and discount rates could also flow through operating expense. The filing evidence contains no peer or industry comparison.

Risks and what to watch

Reported facts: MSCI entered the three months ended June 30, 2026 with revenue of $867,000,000 and net income attributable to the parent of $342,000,000. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, revenue was $1,717,800,000 and net income attributable to the parent was $748,000,000. The corresponding prior-year comparatives were revenue of $772,700,000 and $1,518,500,000, while attributable net income was $303,700,000 and $592,300,000. Both revenue and attributable earnings increased year over year in the quarterly and six-month year-to-date views.

Management explanations: The company said PM Insights’ data is expected to support the development of new private-markets indexes and related products. The pending First Street acquisition is expected to close in the third quarter, subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions, with its results to be reported within the Sustainability and Climate operating segment afterward. Management also described expected synergies from the acquired technology platforms and proprietary databases supporting goodwill recognized for the Vantager, Compass, and PM Insights acquisitions. That goodwill is not deductible for income tax purposes.

Analyst inference: The acquisition pipeline creates execution and integration exposure rather than proof of future returns. Results from First Street could increase the contribution of the Sustainability and Climate segment only after closing, so the current filing does not establish that acquisition-related growth has already occurred. The filing evidence does not attribute this change to any single cause.

Counter-evidence: The broader financial picture is not uniformly positive in direction, even though the headline revenue and earnings comparisons improved. The filing evidence also shows higher investing and financing cash outflows in the six-month view, while operating cash flow increased and both common-stock repurchases and ordinary dividends increased. The concentration of acquisition consideration in contingent payments, including potential cash payments tied to specified revenue thresholds during the period after closing, adds sensitivity to achievement of those thresholds.

Unknowns: The filing does not provide a peer or industry benchmark in the filing evidence. The filing evidence contains no peer or industry comparison. It also does not establish the eventual purchase-accounting effect, integration costs, revenue contribution, or profitability of the acquired businesses. The outcome of regulatory review, the timing and final terms of First Street’s closing, and the performance of the Sustainability and Climate segment remain forward-looking considerations. The fair-value measurement for contingent consideration is classified as Level 3 because its inputs are not observable in the market, which increases dependence on management forecasts and assumptions.

Metrics to watch next period: Track revenue and attributable net income against the prior-year comparative, while separating organic performance from acquisitions and integration effects. Observe operating cash flow alongside repurchases and dividends, and monitor the direction of investing and financing cash flows. After First Street closes, examine its reported segment results, purchase accounting, goodwill, contingent-consideration remeasurement, and the revenue thresholds governing additional payments. No single data point should be treated as proof of sustainable earnings quality without confirming operating-cash conversion, segment execution, and acquisition outcomes together.

Evidence

AI analysis by Lizely. Grounded in linked public evidence. Participants are fictional editorial roles, not real people or human authors.

More from other categories